Album Art

I’m never alone; I’m alone all the time.

ArtistBush
TitleGlycerine
AlbumSixteen Stone

Now, the actual effect of the recount is obviously something of a side issue when assessing the actions of the Court. Nobody knew the outcome of the recount, only that it threatened to make Al Gore president, and stopping it would guarantee Bush’s victory. That is the environment in which five Republican-appointed justices essentially invented a one-time-only ruling to stop the recount. And that’s the relevant history in which to understand the Court’s decision to make up its own new legal theories about the regulation of the health-care market now.

Couldn’t agree more.  It’s obvious that the decision itself was hastily structured to favor Bush.  If you don’t agree, watch Recount, the film that … recounts the saga in strikingly neutral ways.  Both sides actually admitted that it was quite accurate of what transpired in the lead up to the case.
(Also, that film is worth a viewing solely for Laura Dern’s portrayal of Katherine Harris.  ALL THE AWARDS!)

Now, the actual effect of the recount is obviously something of a side issue when assessing the actions of the Court. Nobody knew the outcome of the recount, only that it threatened to make Al Gore president, and stopping it would guarantee Bush’s victory. That is the environment in which five Republican-appointed justices essentially invented a one-time-only ruling to stop the recount. And that’s the relevant history in which to understand the Court’s decision to make up its own new legal theories about the regulation of the health-care market now.

Couldn’t agree more.  It’s obvious that the decision itself was hastily structured to favor Bush.  If you don’t agree, watch Recount, the film that … recounts the saga in strikingly neutral ways.  Both sides actually admitted that it was quite accurate of what transpired in the lead up to the case.

(Also, that film is worth a viewing solely for Laura Dern’s portrayal of Katherine Harris.  ALL THE AWARDS!)

This must be real.

This must be real.


So far, I don’t necessarily agree that Rick Perry is George Bush on crack, but he could definitely be described as George Bush 2.0. He is also a phenomenon that has quickly attracted intense interest and high poll numbers that continue to climb (he is currently, in most polls, the Republican frontrunner). All of it, I quite frankly do not understand. I feel like a character in “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” but instead of pointing out that the emperor isn’t wearing any clothes, I am pointing out that this person is in every way unelectable on a national scale.

Sometimes I have (begrudging) respect for Meghan McCain.  This is not necessarily one of those times.

So far, I don’t necessarily agree that Rick Perry is George Bush on crack, but he could definitely be described as George Bush 2.0. He is also a phenomenon that has quickly attracted intense interest and high poll numbers that continue to climb (he is currently, in most polls, the Republican frontrunner). All of it, I quite frankly do not understand. I feel like a character in “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” but instead of pointing out that the emperor isn’t wearing any clothes, I am pointing out that this person is in every way unelectable on a national scale.

Sometimes I have (begrudging) respect for Meghan McCain.  This is not necessarily one of those times.


The New York Times columnist wrote a blog post called “The Years of Shame,” in which he said that “what happened after 9/11” was “deeply shameful.” Krugman castigated people like Rudy Giuliani and President Bush as “fake heroes” who exploited the attacks for their own personal, political or military gain. He also said that many in the media had “[lent] their support to the hijacking of the atrocity.”

Paul Krugman is a god.  As for calling him irrelevant, Glenn Reynolds?  Next time you’re a Nobel winner on the faculty at Princeton, you can maybe consider throwing around insults like calling someone a “sad and irrelevant little man.”

The New York Times columnist wrote a blog post called “The Years of Shame,” in which he said that “what happened after 9/11” was “deeply shameful.” Krugman castigated people like Rudy Giuliani and President Bush as “fake heroes” who exploited the attacks for their own personal, political or military gain. He also said that many in the media had “[lent] their support to the hijacking of the atrocity.”

Paul Krugman is a god.  As for calling him irrelevant, Glenn Reynolds?  Next time you’re a Nobel winner on the faculty at Princeton, you can maybe consider throwing around insults like calling someone a “sad and irrelevant little man.”

Cosign.

Cosign.